10.
f
11
292
identifying him.
Ic Rays he saw him 8 or 9 years ago at See Woo; then he attacked his junks again when 2th March, 1880. He never saw him till he came to his Court. A man in the shop told him his name. Defendant's name was Cheung A Yat. He says in the passage I have before quoted:
"We agreed to report to the Mandarin till last February.
A On gives details of the attack, and says the accused was recognized - they had two junks. Ho Ayik says nothing of two junks.
And it is curious that See A On did not recognize Chang A Chi; for, according to Ho Ayik, Chang A Chi came to Hongkong and told him his name.
Yet he recognized him when he was brought down in the sauce steamer as Chang Chi.
He made no report to the Mandarin till the month of February, the first time he spoke to the Mandarin about it.
If he really knew the accused when he was on board, what reason was there for the Mandarin to tell him the man he had to identify, and to agree upon his name?
The 3rd witness examined was kieng Tion, crew on board of the junk when Chang Chi attacked.
10.
f
11
292
iductifying him.
Ic
Rays
he
saw hime
8or 9-
years ago at See Woo; then
he attacked his junts(
again when
2th March, 1880)
junk(12
ver saw him till he
and that he
ccavelo Court. A to his
On
" He
name Su
· asked defendant his sarp:- "name. A man in the shop told
" me his name. Defendant's name "was Cheung A yat. Fivether on le
"
he
says in the passage I have before quoted :
"1
We
agreed to his name Ite wade
Av
report to the Mandarin till last
February.
details
ROUE
a On gives of the attack, and
accueið was
sa says
the onlyanau ke
the
recognized - they had two juucks.
Ho Ayik says nothing of twos juuks.
Ford
And it is curious that See a On
did not
4 recognize Chang & Chi ; for,
according to to Ayik,
Chang this to Hongkong Ho A yik
name,
he told him.
he cance de
Yet he
down
in the sauce steamer as
whe
for Chang Chis
brought down
Case,
He made no report
and sa
29.170
report to the altariðarin that the month of February
the first live he epoke to the Mandarin
about it.
If he really know the aconced
when he
Avas
carte on
board what reason
was there for the Mandarin to tell him the man he had to identify, and to
agree upon
510
hie
The 3rd witness examind was
evas
examine was kieng Tion. crew on board of the
of the
Chi is said to have
jink when Chang Chi
attacked
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.